A STUDY OF EUPHEMIZED ABUSIVE JAVANESE TERMS AND THEIR FIGURATIVE MEANINGS

Yoseph Edmundus Budiyana, Rakhmadati Dagsani

Abstract


Speech community frequently uses language for insulting. This study deals with a perspective to find out the classification of the euphemized abusive Javanese terms based on Huang and Warren (1993) and their figurative meanings. By using qualitative method, the writer collected nine public documents related to the euphemized abusive Javanese terms. Then, they were examined and validated by five Javanese experts such as lecturers, puppeteers, and teachers to check their accuracy. The results show that based on Huang and Warrens theory, abstract and spirit provenance for insult attacking physical shortcomings; intellectual shortcomings; character and personality deviations; and personal behavior and social deviations are absent. Secondly, the euphemized abusive Javanese terms for insult attacking physical shortcomings are not found. Thirdly, new provenance, emotion is found in insult attacking characters and personalities. Lastly, from figurative meaning facet, the majority of the euphemized abusive Javanese terms have metaphorical meanings, while the others belong to irony and simile.

Keywords


Euphemized abusive Javanese Terms, figurative language, metaphorical meaning, provenance

Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Aman, R. (ed.). Talking dirty. London: Rodsun Books, 1993.

Anonymus.(n.d.)The usage of figurative meaning in the Time Magazine.Retrieved from http://repository.usu.ac.id/bit stream/123456789/19290/5/Chapter%20I.pdf, 1 April 2012.

Conley, T. Toward a rhetoric of insult. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2010.

Cruise, A. Meaning in language: An introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. United States: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Kramsch, C. Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Leech, G. N. andM. H. Short.Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English practical prose. London and New York: Longman,1981.

Mindari, R. A study on figurative language and nonverbal symbols in the Javanese wedding ceremony. Unpublished postgraduate dissertation. Institute of Teacher Training and Education, Malang, 1999.

OGraddy, W., M. Dobrovolsk and F. Katamba.Contemporary Linguistics: An introduction. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited, 1997.

Prihatmi, S. R., A. Basuki, T. Yusuf, and Slamet. Peribahasa Jawa sebagai cermin watak, sifat, dan perilaku manusia Jawa. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2003.

Sartini, N. W. Menggali kearifan local budaya Jawa lewat ungkapan (Bebasan, saloka, danparibasa). In Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, Vol. V, 2009:28-37.

Saville-Troike, M.The ethnography of communication: An introduction. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2003.

Stull, B. T. The elements of figurative language. New York: Longman, 1961.

Sutcliffe, R. Figure of Speech.Retrieved March 5, 2012, from http://www.opundo.com/figures.php?searchstr=*, 28 Decem ber 2005.

Swan, M. Practical English Usage. London: Oxford University Press, 1980.

Toner, H. and E. Whittome.As level English language and literature. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2003.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v13i2.25



Copyright (c)



| pISSN (print): 1412-3320 | eISSN (online): 2502-4914 | web
analytics View My Stats