An Analysis of Using Phrases in Writing Recount Text at Tenth Grader in SMA Parulian 2 Medan

Gadis Selvia Sitorus, Kammer Sipayung,


This thesis is the study about an error analysis of using phrases in writing recount text at tenth grader in SMA Parulian 2 Medan. The objective of the study is to identify the types of common phrases error made by the students of tenth grader in SMA Parulian 2 Medan in writing recount text. This study used descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this study is is the tenth grade students of SMA Parulian 2 Medan which consists of three classes. The object of this study is class of X-A. The instrument of collecting data used writing test, writing recount text. The data were analyzed by identifying the students phrases errors by underlining each errors from students answer sheet, after that classifying the types of error based on five types of phrases. Finally, The research result showed that there are 145 phrases errors made by the students X-A in writing recount text. the types of phrases which indicates common error is on noun phrase. The number of noun phrase error are 83 with percentage 57,24%, followed by verb phrase has 28 with percentage 19,31%, the third is prepositional phrase which has 22 with percentage 15,17%, the fourth is adjective phrase which has 10 with percentage 6,90%, the last is adverb phrase has 2 with percentage 1,38%. It was caused the students constructed or arranged the words or sentences based on Indonesian meaning. English has different rules in constructing phrases. The students also were lack of knowledge about phrases. Therefore, English teachers are expected to focus on types of phrases in learning English.
Key words: error analysis, error on phrases

Save to Mendeley


Error Analysis, Error on Phrases


Bao, Xiaoli. 2015. Senior High School Students’ Errors on the Use of Relative Words. Journal of English Language Teaching. Inner Mongolia University, 8, 137-154.

Brown, H.G. 2007. Fifth Edition : Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education,Inc.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., and Krashen,S. 1982. Language Two.New York: Oxford University Press.

Gelderen, E.V. 2010. An Introduction to the Grammar of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Jain, P.M and Patel,M.F. 2008. English Language Teaching (Mehods, Tools, Techniques). Jaipur : Sunrise Publisher & Distributors.

Krisnawati,E. 2013.Errors or Mistakes? Incorrectness in Students’ Answer in a Subject-Matter Examination. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World. Padjajaran University. 4(4), 185-196.

Kirszner, L.G.,& Mandell, S.R. 2008. Eight Edition : The Wadsword Handbook. Boston: Thomson Higher Education.

Kirszner, L.G.,& Mandell, S.R. 2009. Writing First Practice in Context with Reading Fourth Edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Knapp, P.,& Watkins, M. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney: University New South Wales.

Martin, J. 1984. Health English. Lexington: D.C. Health and Company.

Mehler, A., Sharoff,. S., and Santini, M. 2010. Genre on the Web Computational Models and Empirical Studies. London: Springer Science & Bussiness Media.

Pardiyono. (2007). Pasti Bisa! Teaching Genre-Based Writing.Andi: Yogjakarta

Prihandini, A. 2011. The Analysis of Function, Category and Role in English Headlines. Journal of Language Science, 6, 1-21.

Ratnah. 2013. Error Analysis on Tenses Usage Made by Indonesian Students. Journal of Education and Practice. Makassar Tourism Academy, 6, 159-169.

Saville-Troike,M. 2006. Introducing Second Language Acquisition. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sudijono, A. 2014. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Indonesia.


Article Metrics

Abstract viewed : 132 times

Copyright (c) 2018 Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature

| pISSN (print): 1412-3320 | eISSN (online): 2502-4914 | web
analytics View My Stats