Applying Metacognitive Strategies in Comprehending English Reading Texts

Zulfadli A. Aziz, Chairina Nasir, Ramazani Ramazani,




Abstract

Comprehending English text is still regarded as hard for students. Metacognitive strategies have been considered effective in overcoming reading difficulties by many researchers. The objective of this study is to describe the application of three types of metacognitive reading strategies (global strategies, problem solving strategies, and support strategies) used by the students of Senior High School (SMAN) 1 Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar. It is a descriptive qualitative study. Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) questionnaire suggested by Mokhtari and Reichard (2002) was used to collect the data. The result of the study revealed that the students generally showed moderate awareness of all strategies and held a preference of using Problem Solving Strategies, followed by Support Strategies and Global Strategies respectively. The study also showed that high performance students used the strategies more frequently than low performance students. It can be concluded that the more students aware of using metacognitive reading strategies, the better their performance is in reading skill. Therefore, teaching the students to use metacognitive strategies can be a solution in enhancing students’ reading ability.


Save to Mendeley



Keywords

Reading comprehension, metacognitive reading strategies, low and high performance students

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61, 364-373.

Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. (2013). The Importance of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6 (10), 235-244.

Bernhardt, E. (2005). Progress and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 133-150.

Chamot, A. U. & O’Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, A. (1990). Language Learning: Insights for Learners, Teachers, and Researchers. New York: Newbury House.

Genc, H. (2011). Paper and Screen: Reading Strategies Used by Low-Proficient EFL Learners. Sino-US English Teaching , 8 (10), pp. 648-658.

Gorsuch, G., & Taguchi, E. (2010). Developing Reading Fluency and Comprehension Using Repeated Reading: Evidence from Longitudinal Student Reports. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 27-59.

Grabe, W. (2004). Research on Teaching Reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-69.

Kara, S. (2015). Reading Strategies: Prospective Teachers and Their Teaching Practices. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies In the World, 5 (3), 20-28

Keshavarz, M. & Mobarra, M. (2003). The Effects of Simplification and Elaboration on Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Learners. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 101-117.

McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Meneghetti, C., Carretti, B. & De Beni, R. (2006). Components of Reading Comprehension and Scholastic Achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 291–301.

Mokhtari, K. & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 249-259.

Ozek, Y., & Civelek, M. (2006). A Study on The Use of Cognitive Reading Strategies by ELT Students. The Asian EFL Journal, 1-26.

Phan, N. (2006). Effective reading. Retrieved on April 10, 2015 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/pta_march_14_np.php

Richards, C. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 3rd Edition. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Richards, J. C., Platt J. & Platt H. (1992). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Essex: Longman.

Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differencess in The Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Among Native and Non-Native Readers. System, 29, 431-449.

Sweet, A. P. & Snow, C. (2002). Reconceptualizing Reading Comprehension. In C. C. Block, L. B. Gambrell, M. Pressley (Eds.), Improving Comprehension Instruction (pp. 17-53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Tovani, C. (2000). I Read It, But I Don’t Get It: Comprehension Strategies for Adolescent Readers. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.

Wen, Q. F. (2003). The Successful Way of Learning English. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Wenden, A. L. & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Zhang, L. & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive Strategy Use and Academic Reading Achievement: Insights from a Chinese Context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching , 10 (1), 54-69.

Zhang, L. J. & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese Senior High School EFL Students’ Metacognitive Awareness and Reading-Strategy. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37-59.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v19i1.1863

Article Metrics

Abstract viewed : 157 times
PDF files downloaded : 8 times



Copyright (c) 2019 Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature



| pISSN (print): 1412-3320 | eISSN (online): 2502-4914 | web
analytics View My Stats