CODING LOGICAL MECHANISM AND STEREOTYPING IN GENDER CYBER HUMORS

Truly Almendo Pasaribu, A. Effendi Kadarisman,



Abstract

Gender-related humors have their own way of being funny; and this research aims to find out how and why they are funny. For this purpose, both researchers have collected 50 gender cyber humors and analyzed them, first, to decode how their logical mechanism relates to specific linguistic features, and secondly, to uncover how gender stereotyping contributes to the comical effects. The twisting of logic and linguistic ambiguity is analyzed formally using Attardos (2001) General Theory of Verbal Humor (GTVH) and supported by gender studies. The findings reveal that the logical mechanism consists of elements of incongruities, and gender stereotyping presents negative stereotypical images. The analysis further shows that some gender stereotypical images ridicule traditional roles of man and woman while others make fun of non-traditional representations. This shift from women only to both men and women as targets of gender humors has been an impact of effective feminist movements.

Save to Mendeley



Keywords

gender humor, stereotyping, logical mechanism, incongruity.

Full Text:

PDF

References

______. Aha!jokes, (Online), (http://www.aha!jokes.com accessed on September 2015)

______. 2007. Encarta Electronic Dictionary. 1993-2006 Microsoft Corporation.

______. 2005. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. London: Longman.

Attardo, S. 2001. Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouten de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. and Raskin, V. 1991.Script Theory Revisited: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model. Humor 43/4, 293347.

Azis. A. L. 2008. Ucup KeliksPlesetan: A Study of Twisting Linguistic Ambiguity in Oral Verbal Humor. Unpublished undergraduate thesis. Malang: Faculty of Letters of State Unversity of Malang.

Bennett, P. B and Lengacher, C.A. 2006. Humor and Laughter may Influence Health, (Online), (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1375238/)

Chavetz, J. 1978. Masculine, Feminine or Human?: An Overview of the Sociology of the Gender Roles (2nd ed.). Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers.

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Derrida, J. 1978. Writing and Difference, trans. Bass, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Gruner, C. R. 1976. Understanding Laughter: The Workings of Wit and Humor. Chicago: Nelson-Hall. (Online),

Kadarisman, A. E. 2002. Trends and Issues in Linguistics: Teaching Materials. Malang: Unpublished.

Kies, Daniel. 2012. Using Logic in Composition, (online) (http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp1/logic.htm, accessed on June 2015)

Kotthoff, H. 2006. Gender and Humor: The State of the Art. Journal of Pragmatics. 38(1), 4-25.

Laineste, Liisi 2008. Politics of Joking: Ethnic Jokes and their Targets in Estonia (1890s 2007). Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore, Vol. 40, pp. 117146

Latief, M. A. 1999. Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Forum Penelitian Kependidikan, 11(2): 103-116.

Lim, T. C. 2004. Advanced English Idioms for Effective Communication. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Monro, D. H. 1988. Theories of Humor. Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum 3rd ed. Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen, eds. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company. 349-55.

Paramitasari, L. 2007. Twisting Linguistic Ambiguity in Written Verbal Humor in Readers Digest.Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. Malang: Faculty of Letters of State Universityof Malang.

Raskin, V. (1985) Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D.Reidel Publishing Company. (Online), (http://books.google.com/books?id)

Soedjatmiko, W. 1988. Linguistic and Cultural Analysis on American Written Verbal Humor and its Pedagogical Implication. Unpublished Dissertation. Malang: Postgraduate Faculty of State University of Malang.

Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., and Quinn, D. M. 1999. Stereotype Threat and Womens Math Performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 428.

Thornbury, Scott. 2005. Beyond the Sentence: Introducing Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Macmillan.

Tong, R. P. 1998. Feminist Thought: Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Arus Utama Pemikiran Feminis (edisi Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Wilis, T. T. 2008. Disneys Mulan: Upholding Misogyny. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. Malang: Faculty of Letters of State Unversityof Malang.

Willis, K. 2002. Making Sense of Humour: Some Pragmatic and Political Aspects, (Online), (http://www.pragmaticshumour.net/makingsenseofhumour.htm accessed on February 2008).


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v16i1.485

Article Metrics

Abstract viewed : 285 times
PDF files downloaded : 71 times



Copyright (c)



| pISSN (print): 1412-3320 | eISSN (online): 2502-4914 | web
analytics View My Stats