A Joint Construction Practice in an Academic Writing Course in an Indonesian University Context

Aunurrahman Aunurrahman, Fuad Abdul Hamied, Emi Emilia,


This research aims to explore the students’ writing and critical thinking capacity in a joint construction practice in an academic writing course. The course applied a genre-based approach in teaching academic writing and critical thinking to first-year English as a Foreign Language students of a private university in Pontianak, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. A combination of explicit teaching, group discussion, and online review sessions was employed in the joint construction practice for three meetings. The source for the data collection was a jointly constructed text. The text was selected from thirty-six students who worked in groups. Every group consisted of low achievers, medium achievers, and high achievers in writing. The text was analyzed using functional grammar. The analysis shows that the students had gained a good control of the exposition genre with its linguistic features. Thematic progression and logical connectors at the text level and circumstances (adverbs) at the clause level had realized critical thinking skills and dispositions. Several grammatical mistakes and improper lexical choices were identified but did not interfere with the purpose of the text. The findings suggest that having more classroom meetings will make explicit teaching and group discussion work effectively before the students begin to write independently. Moreover, online review sessions can support the students' learning but with limitations.

Save to Mendeley


a genre-based approach, joint construction practice, academic writing, critical thinking

Full Text:



American Psychological Association (Ed.). (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Aunurrahman, Hamied, F. A., & Emilia, E. (2016). Facilitating character building through an academic writing practice. Arab World English Journal, 7(3), 146–160. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no3.11

Aunurrahman, Hamied, F. A., & Emilia, E. (2017). Exploring the tertiary EFL students’ academic writing competencies. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6860

Bailey, S. (2006). Academic writing: A handbook for international students (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Bailin, S., & Siegel, H. (2003). Critical thinking. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. D. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education (pp. 181–193). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Bruce, I. (2008a). Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis. New York, NY: Continuum.

Bruce, I. (2008b). Theorising tertiary writing instruction: Accounting for the process, post-process, genre and critical literacies approaches. In Proceedings of the TWN Biennial Colloquium: From here to there, December 2-3, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/2053

Bruce, I. (2013). A role for genre-based pedagogy in academic writing instruction: An EAP perspective. TEXT Journal, (21), 1–15.

Coffin, C. (2004). Arguing about how the world is or how the world should be: The role of argument in IELTS tests. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.11.002

Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. P. (2012). Academic literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004

DasBender, G. (2011). Writing spaces: Readings on writing (Vol. 2). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/writingspaces2/

Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Rozelle, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.

Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal, 34(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400202

Derewianka, B. (2012). Knowledge about language in the Australian curriculum: English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(2), 127–146.

Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2010, October). Universal intellectual standards. Retrieved December 6, 2014, from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/universal-intellectual-standards/527

Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2013). Critical thinking: Intellectual standards essential to reasoning well within every domain of human thought. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(3), 34–35.

Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing in a tertiary EFL context in Indonesia (Unpublished Dissertation). The University of Melbourne, Melbourne. Retrieved from https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/39548

Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching writing: Developing critical learners. Bandung, Indonesia: Rizqi Press.

Emilia, E. (2012). Pendekatan genre-based dalam pengajaran bahasa Inggris: Petunjuk untuk guru (2nd ed.). Bandung, Indonesia: Rizqi Press.

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung, Indonesia: Pustaka Jaya.

Emilia, E., & Hamied, F. A. (2015). Systemic functional linguistic genre pedagogy (SFL GP) in a tertiary EFL writing context in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal, 26(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155-182

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2 & 3), 165–182.

Feez, S. (2002). Heritage and innovation in second language education. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 47–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Fontaine, L. (2013). Analysing English grammar: A systemic-functional introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gillett, A. (2017, March 17). Features of academic writing. Retrieved April 7, 2017, from http://www.uefap.com/writing/feature/featfram.htm

Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=98404

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005

Irvin, L. L. (2010). What is “Academic” writing? In Writing spaces: Readings on writing (Vol. 1, pp. 3–17). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

Jones, L. R. (2011). Academic integrity & academic dishonesty: A handbook about cheating & plagiarism (Revised & Expanded Edition). Melbourne, Florida: Florida Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://www.fit.edu/current/documents/plagiarism.pdf

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). New York, US: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840272

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

Martin, J. R. (2006). Mentoring semogenesis: “genre-based” literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes (pp. 123–155). London, UK: Continuum.

Martin, J. R. (2010). Semantic variation – modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis. In J. R. Martin & M. Bednarek (Eds.), New Discourse on Language Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation (pp. 1–34). New York, NY: Continuum.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London, UK: Equinox Publishing.

Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2006). Variation in disciplinary culture: University tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. In R. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickins, & H. Woodfield (Eds.), Language, Culture and Identity in Applied Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, University of Bristol, September 2005 (pp. 99–117). London, UK: British Association for Applied Linguistics in association with Equinox.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (1999). Writing academic English (3rd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Paiz, J. M., Angeli, E., Wagner, J., Lawrick, E., Moore, K., Anderson, M., … Keck, R. (2014, November 11). Purdue OWL: APA Formatting and Style Guide. Retrieved January 19, 2017, from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/owlprint/560/

Promwinai, P. (2010). The demands of argumentative essay writing: Experiences of Thai tertiary students (Doctor of Education thesis). Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, New South Wales. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4298&context=theses

Pullum, G. K. (2014). Fear and loathing of the English passive. Language & Communication, 37, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.08.009

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2009). Language in academic subject areas and classroom instruction: What is academic language and how can we teach it? Presented at the Workshop on the Role of Language in School Learning: Implications for Closing the Achievement Gap, October 15-16, Hewlett Foundation, Menlo Park, CA. Retrieved from https://www.mydigitalchalkboard.org/cognoti/content/file/resources/documents/98/98c3e7f4/98c3e7f49b44eaa5ee60b45939df619b4593afc7/Schleppegrell.pdf

Schulze, J. (2011). Writing to persuade: A systemic functional view. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, (5), 127–157.

Siegel, H. (2010). Critical thinking. International Encyclopedia of Education, 6, 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00582-0

Swales, J. M. (2012). A text and its commentaries: Toward a reception history of “Genre in three traditions”(Hyon, 1996). Ibérica: Revista de La Asociación Europea de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos (AELFE), (24), 103–115.

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Widodo, H. P. (2012, February 26). Five key issues in academic writing: Writing scholarly articles in English. GoLive Indonesia. Retrieved from http://goliveindonesia.com/2012/02/27/five-key-issues-in-academic-writing-writing-scholarly-articles-in-english/

Wingate, U. (2012). “Argument!” helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001

Article Metrics

Abstract : 103 times
PDF : 22 times
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v17i1.1137

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v17i1.1137.g775

Copyright (c) 2017 Celt (A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature)

| pISSN (print): 1412-3320 | eISSN (online): 2502-4914 | web
analytics View My Stats