PRODUKSI RUANG DI DEPARTEMEN ARSITEKTUR UNDIP: STUDI KUALITATIF PERILAKU MAHASISWA DALAM PEMBENTUKAN RUANG INFORMAL BELAJAR

Bagus Setiono, Agung Budi Sardjono

Abstract


At the Department of Architecture, Universitas Diponegoro, students frequently utilize areas outside the classroom—such as corridors and cafeterias—as study spaces in a spontaneous and recurring manner. This research aims to examine the phenomenon of informal space formation by analyzing how student behavior responds to, gives meaning to, and utilizes campus spaces beyond their official functions. Employing a qualitative phenomenological method, data were collected through observations, open-ended questionnaires, and field notes, then analyzed thematically based on the theories of the production of space and environmental behavior. The results indicate that informal spaces are formed through the ways students adapt in search of learning comfort. They select spaces based on the availability of basic amenities (Wi-Fi and power outlets), thermal comfort and natural lighting, easily movable furniture, and proximity to peers for discussions. The novelty of this research highlights that students are not merely passive users, but active agents capable of creating their own study spaces through everyday practices, thereby blurring the boundaries between formal and informal spaces. This study contributes a new perspective for campus designers, suggesting that educational buildings need to provide flexible spaces capable of adapting to the natural habits of their users.


Keywords


informal learning space; spatial production; campus space; environmental behavior; student behavior; architecture students

References


Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. 256.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis : a practical guide to understanding and doing. Los Angeles, 384.

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Department of Communication and PsychologyCentre for Cultural Psychology, 3, 428.

Cox, A. M. (2017). Space and embodiment in informal learning. September 2017, 1077–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0186-1

Creswell, & Creswell. (2018). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 39–51.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Mthods Qual Quant Mixed Methods Approaches.

Dmytrash, O. (2020). ISSUES OF DESIGN OF INFORMAL LEARNING SPACES. 6(2).

Guest, Bunce, & Johnson’s. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough to Identify Metathemes in Multisited and Cross-cultural Research. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16640447

Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space.

Manen, M. Van. (2007). Phenomenology of Practice. 1(1).

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research Evaluation Methods.

Tampubolon, A. C., & Kusuma, H. E. (2019). CAMPUS ’ INFORMAL LEA RNING SPACES FOR READING ACTIVITIES AND THEIR RELATION T O UNDERGRADUATES ’ RE SPONSES. 46(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.46.2.117-128

Temple. (2018). Temple university at a glance 2018 – 2019. 365(Fall).

Uitermark, J., Hochstenbach, C., & van Gent, W. (2017). The statistical politics of exceptional territories. Political Geography, 57, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.11.011

Waldock, J., Rowlett, P., Cornock, C., Robinson, M., & Bartholomew, H. (2017). The role of informal learning spaces in enhancing student engagement with mathematical sciences with mathematical sciences . 48, 587–602.

Wu, X., Kou, Z., Oldfield, P., Heath, T., & Borsi, K. (2021). Informal Learning Spaces in Higher Education : Student Preferences and Activities. 1–27.

Yau, O. K. T., Chin, D. C. W., Hsu, C. H. C., Yau, O. K. T., Chin, D. C. W., Understanding, C. H. C. H., & Kong, H. (2023). Understanding and planning for informal learning space development : A case study in Hong Kong Understanding and planning for informal learning space development : A case study in. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2180863

Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry By Design.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/tesa.v24i1.14544

ISSN 1410-6094 (Print) | ISSN 2460-6367 (Media Online) | View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.