Hubungan Antara Kepuasan Berhuni dan Sikap Terhadap Tempat

Andina Syafrina, Angela Christysonia Tampubolon, Nunik Hasriyanti, Hanson Endra Kusuma

Abstract


The quality of the housing must be properly considered in order to function properly. Currently many housing development failures because lack of attention to quality aspects. The number of failures because lack of knowledge on occupant satisfaction aspects. The residential satisfaction is one of the factor that formers the attitudes toward the place which is the result of interaction between human and the environment where they live and contribute to improvement the quality of life. The aim of this study was to find out the dimension of residential satisfaction in the housing environment, the dimension of attitude toward the place, and the relation between public satisfaction and attitude toward the place. Data collection was carried out based on survey using an online questionnaire. The results showed five dimensions of residential satisfaction in the housing environment, namely environmental comfort, environmental facilities, green open space, environmental management, and infrastructure. There are also two dimensions of attitude toward the place, namely participation and adjustment. The result also showed the tendency of the satisfaction dimension to the environmental comfort related to the attitude of participation and adjustment.

Keywords


residential satisfaction, attitude towards place, residential environment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abadi, A, Adib. 2012. Dampak Kebijakan Penyediaan Infrastruktur Dasar Terhadap Tingkat Hunian Perumahan Menengah ke Bawah. Jurnal Sosioteknologi 25 Tahun 11, 1-10.

Abadi, A, Adib. 2008. Menuju Lingkungan Perumahan Perkotaan yang Berkualitas: Belajar dari Fenomena Kekosongan Perumahan Menengah ke Bawah. Prosiding Eco Urban Design, 1-10.

Adriaanse, C, C, M. 2007. Measuring Residential Satisfaction: a Residential Environmental Satisfaction Scale (RESS). Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22 (3), 287-304.

Aiello, Antoni., et al. 2010. Neighbourhood planning improvement: Physical attributes, cognitive and affective evaluation and activities in two neighbourhoods in Rome. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(3), 264-275.

Ashadi., et al. 2016. Pencahayaan dan Ruang Gerak Efektif Sebagai Indikator Kenyamanan Pada Rumah Sederhana Sehat yang Ergonomis. Jurnal Arsitektur NALARs. 15 (2), 35-44.

Caritas, Agus, Inter, A., et al. 2017. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kepuasan Hunian Perumahan Bersubsidi Di Kota Malang. Rekayasa Sipil. 11 (1), 41-48.

Doxiadis, Constantinos, A. 1970. Ekistics, the Science of uman Settlements. Form Science. 170 (3956), p. 393-404.

Ernawati, Jenny & Mustikawati, Triandriani. 2009. Model Teoritik Hubungan Kepuasan Berhuni dengan Place Attachment di Perkotaan. Laporan Hasil Penelitian Fundamental. Tidak diterbitkan. Arsitektur. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.

Grimm, Laurence, G & Yarnold, Paul, R. 2001. Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics. Washington: American Pshycological Association.

Groat, Linda & Wang, David. (2013). Architectural Research Methods (Second Edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.

Hakim, Rustam & Utomo, Hardi. 2003. Komponen Perancangan Arstektur Lansekap. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Hashemnezhad, Hashem., Yasdanfar, Seyed, A., et al. 2013. Comparison the Concepts of Sense of Place and Attachment to Place in Architectural Studies. Malaysia Journal of Society and Space. 9 (1), 107-117.

Helmi, Avin, F. 1999. Beberapa Teori Psikologi Lingkungan. Buletin Psikologi. No. 2, 7-19.

Jorgensen, Bradley, S & Stedman, Richard, C. 2001. Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitudes Toward Their Properties. Journal of Environment Psychology. 21, p. 233-248.

Karyono, Tri, H. 2001. Teori dan Acuan Kenyamanan Termis dalam Arsitektur. Jakarta: PT. Catur Libra Optima.

Kolcaba, Katharine. 2001. Evolution of The Mid Range Theory of Comfort for Outcomes Research. Nursing Outlook. 49 (2), 86-92.

Kumar, Ranjit. 2005. Research Metodology, A Step by Step Guide for Beginner. London: Sage Publications.

Kusuma, H, E. 2013. Value Lingkungan Alami. Retrieved form https://iplbi.or.id/value-lingkungan-alami/.

Laurens, Joyce, M. 2006. Pendekatan Perilaku Lingkungan Dalam Perancangan Pemukiman Kota. Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur. 34 (1), 19-30.

Lavrakas, Paul, J. 2008. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Maslow, Abraham, H. 1994. Motivasi dan Kepribadian 1: Teori Motivasi dengan Pendekatan Hirarki Kebutuhan Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.

M, Sastra, S & Marlina, Endy. 2006. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Perumahan. Yogyakarta: ANDI Yogyakarta.

Mohit, Mohammad, A & Azim, Mohamed. 2012. Assessment of Residential Satisfaction with Public Housing in Hulhumale’, Maldives. Procedia Social and Behaviour Sciences. 50, p. 756-770.

Muchlis, Aulia, F & Kusuma, Hanson, E. 2016. Persepsi Kriteria Kenyamanan Rumah Tinggal. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah IPLBI, D107-D110.

Mustikawati, Triandriani & Ernawati, Jenny. 2014. Variabel Aspek Kepuasan Berhuni di Lingkungan Hunian Perkotaan, Kota Malang. Jurnal RUAS. 12 (1), 1-9.

Najafi, Mina & Kamal, Mustafa. 2011. The Concept of Place and Sense of Place Architectural Studies. International Science Index, Humanities and Social Sciences. 5 (8), 1054-1060.

Nurhayati, Yuli. 2015. Sense of Place pada Masyarakat yang Tinggal di Sekitar TPA Supit Urang Kota Malang. Skripsi. Tidak diterbitkan. Program Studi Psikologi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang

Rachman, Riska, A & Kusuma, Hanson, E. 2014. Definisi Kebetahan dalam Ranah Arsitektur dan Lingkungan Perilaku. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah IPLBI. A55-A60.

Sakina, Bunga & Kusuma, Hanson, E. 2014. Pengaruh Kepuasan Berhuni Terhadap Keinginan pada Hunian Sewa. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah IPLBI. E27-E32.

Sam, Mehdi., et al. 2012. Residential Satisfaction and Construction. Scientific Research and Essays. 7 (15), pp. 1556-1563.

Sajeva, Svetlana., et al. 2012. Subjectively Evaluated Quality of Life: the Case of Largest Cities of Lithuania. Social Sciences: Socialiniai mokslai. 4 (78), 22-34.

Shamai, Shmuel. 1991. Sense of Place: an Empirical Measurement. Geoforum. 22 (3), pp. 347-358.

Smith, Kylie, M. 2011. The Relationship Between Residential Satisfaction, Sense of Community, Sense of Belonging And Sense of Place in a Western Australian Urban Planned Community. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/460 .

Suharyat, Yayat. 2009. Hubungan Antara Sikap, Minat, dan Perilaku Manusia. Region. 1 (3), 1-19.

Syafrini, Delmira. 2013. Bank Sampah: Mekanisme Pendorong Perubahan Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Humanus. 12 (2), 155-167.

Weidemann, Sue & Anderson, James, R. 1985. A conceptual framework for residential satisfaction. In Altman, Irwin& Werner, Carol, M. Home environments. New York and London: Plenum Press

Widiastomo, Yudhi. 2014. Pengaruh Kualitas Rumah dan Lingkungan Terhadap Kepuasan Penghuni dan Kecenderungan Berpindah di Perumnas Bukit Sendangmulyo Semarang. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota. 10 (4), 413-424.

Yamada, Naoko., et al. 2009. Life satisfaction of urban residents: Do health perception, wealth, safety, community pride and, and cultural tourism matter?. International CHRIE Conference-Refereed Track. 24. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/refereed/Sessions/Friday/24 .

Zuchdi, Darmiyati. 1995. Pembentukan Sikap. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 3 Tahun XIV, 51-63.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/tesa.v17i2.1311

ISSN 1410-6094 (Print) | ISSN 2460-6367 (Media Online) | View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.