Pengaruh Praktik Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Perubahan Organisasi dan Kinerja Organisasi Pada Sektor Publik di Kota Semarang

Clara Susilawati, MSi., Devina Ratnasari,


The main purpose of this research is to examine the effect of management accounting practices on organizational change and organizational performance. Previous empirical studies have shown that the success of management accounting practices in public sector organizations has not been convincing so that it raises doubts regarding the effectiveness of these practices in encouraging organizational change and improving performance. The sample are staff from 8 Government Agencies, 21 Government Offices, 6 Regional Companies, 17 Government Administrations (Districts), and 1 Regional Hospital in Semarang. Data analytical technique used in this research is SEM PLS. The results show that contemporary management accounting practices are positively associated with organizational change and organizational performance. The results also show that, when the public sector increasingly uses contemporary management accounting practices, changes will often occur in these organizations and these practices are able to facilitate the public sector to improve its performance. However, the results that traditional management accounting practices are not associated with organizational change and organizationanl performance.
Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh praktik akuntansi manajemen terhadap perubahan organisasi dan kinerja organisasi pada sektor publik. Studi empiris terdahulu menunjukkan keberhasilan praktik akuntansi manajemen pada organisasi sektor publik belum menyakinkan sehingga memunculkan keraguan terkait dengan keefektifan praktik-praktik tersebut dalam mendorong perubahan organisasi dan peningkatan kinerja. Sampel diambil dari 8 Badan Pemerintah, 21 Dinas Pemerintah, 6 Perusahaan Daerah, 17 Administrasi Pemerintah (Kecamatan), dan 1 RSUD. Pengujian hipotesis pada penelitian ini menggunakan SEM PLS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik akuntansi manajemen kontemporer berhubungan positif dengan perubahan organisasi dan kinerja organisasi. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa, ketika sektor publik semakin sering menggunakan praktik akunntansi manajemen kontemporer maka perubahan-perubahan akan sering terjadi pada organisasi tersebut dan praktik akuntansi manajemen kontemporer mampu memfasilitasi sektor publik untuk meningkatkan kinerjanya. Namun hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa praktik akuntansi manajemen tradisional tidak berhubungan dengan perubahan organisasi dan praktik akuntansi manajemen tradisional tidak berhubungan dengan kinerja organisasi.

Save to Mendeley


management accounting, public sector, organizational change, organizational performance.

Full Text:



Adler; R., A.Everett., and M.Waldron. 2000. Advanced Management Accounting Techniques in Manufacturing: Utilization, Benefits, and Barriers to Implementation. Accounting Forum 24(2):131–50.

Antwi, K. B., F.Analoui., and D. Agyekum. 2008. Public Sector Reform In Sub-Saharan Africa: What Can Be Learnt From The Civil Service Performance Improvement Programme In Ghana? Public Administration and Development 28(4):253-264.

Ashworth, R., G. Boyne., and R. Delbridge. 2009. Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(1):165–87.

Awerbuch, S., J. Dillard., T. Mouck., and A. Preston. 1996. Capital Budgeting, Technological Innovation and the Emerging Competitive Environment of the Electric Power Industry. Energy Policy 24(2):195–202,

Banker, R., I. Bardhan., and T. Chen. 2008. The Role of Manufacturing Practices in Mediating the Impact of Activity-Based Costing on Plant Performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(1):1–19.

Chenhall, R. 1997. Reliance on Manufacturing Performance Measures, Total Quality Management and Organizational Performance. Management Accounting Research 8(2):187–206.

Chenhall. R., and K. Smith. 1998. The Relationship between Strategic Priorities, Management Techniques and Management Accounting: An Empirical Investigation Using a Systems Approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(3):243–64.

__________________. 1998. Adoption and Benefits of Management Accounting Practice: An Australian Study. Management Accounting Research 9(1):1–19.

__________________. 1999. The Implementation of Innovative Mnagement Accounting Systems . Australian Accounting Review 9(3):37–46.

Chia, Y., and H. Koh. 2007. Organizational Culture and the Adoption of Management Accounting Practices in the Public Sector: A Singapore Study. Financial Accountability & Management 23(2):189–213.

Christensen, T., and Lægreid. 2007. The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform. Public Administration Review 67(6):1059–66.

Conley, T. 2005. Benchmarking in the Non‐profit Sector in Australia. Benchmarking: An International Journal 12(3):219–35.

Dean, J., and M. Sharfman. 1996. Does Decision Process Matter? A Study of Strategic Decision-Making Effectiveness. Source: The Academy of Management Journal Academy of Management Journal 39(2):368–96.

Farneti, F., and J. Guthrie. 2008. Italian and Australian Local Governments: Balanced Scorecard Practices. A Research Note. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting 12(1):4–13.

Farragher, E., R. Kleiman, and A.Sahu. 2001. The Association Between The Use Of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Practices And Corporate Performance. The Engineering Economist 46(4):300–311.

Ferreira, A. and D. Otley. 2009. The Design and Use of Performance Management Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis.Management Accounting Research 20(4):263–82.

Gimbert, X., J. Bisbe., and X. Mendoza. 2010. The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Strategy Formulation Processes. Long Range Planning 43(4):477–97.

Holmes, J., S. Piñeres., and L. Kiel. 2006. Reforming Government Agencies Internationally: Is There a Role for the Balanced Scorecard?” International Journal of Public Administration 29(12):1125–45.

Hood, C. 1995. The New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20(2–3):93–109.

Hoque, Z., and J. Moll. 2001. Public Sector Reform ? Implications for Accounting, Accountabil- Ity and Performance of State-Owned Entities ? An Australian Perspective, International Journal of Public Sector Management 14(8):304-326.

Hoque, Z. 2004. A Contingency Model of the Association between Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance Measurement: Impact on Organizational Performance. International Business Review 13(4):485–502.

Hyvönen, J. 2005. Adoption and Benefits of Management Accounting Systems: Evidence from Finland and Australia. Advances in International Accounting 18(05):97–120.

Ittner, C., W. Lanen., and D. Larcker. 2002. Activity-Based Costing and Manufacturing Performance. Journal of Accounting Research 40(3).

Jackson, A., and I. Lapsley. 2003. The Diffusion of Accounting Practices in the New ‘Managerial’ Public Sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management 16(5):359–372.

Jensen, M. 2002. Corporate Budgeting Is Broken, Let’s Fix It. Working Paper, Havard University

Kaplan, R., and H. Johnson . 1987. Relevance Lost : The Rise and Fall of Managament Accounting. Boston: MA : Harvard Bussines School.

Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 2001. Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II. Accounting Horizons 15(2):147–60.

Kennedy, F., and S. Widener. 2008. A Control Framework: Insights from Evidence on Lean Accounting. Management Accounting Research 19(4):301–23.

King, R., P. Clarkson., and S. Wallace. 2010. Budgeting Practices and Performance in Small Healthcare Businesses. Management Accounting Research 21(1):40–55.

Langfield, K., Thorne ., and R. ilton., 2009. Management Accounting Information for Creating and Managing Value. Australia Mc Graw Hill.

Lapsley, I. 2009. New Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit? 1 Abacus 45(1):1–21.

_______, and R.Oldfield. 1999. The Past Is the Future: Constructing Public Sector Accountants. Pacific Accounting Review 11(2):137–47.

_______, and E.Wright. 2004. The Diffusion of Management Accounting Innovations in the Public Sector: A Research Agenda. Management Accounting Research 15(3):355–74.

Maiga, A., and F. Jacobs. 2008. Extent of ABC Use and Its Consequences. Contemporary Accounting Research 25(2):533–66.

Malmi, T., and D. Brown. 2008. Management Control Systems as a Package-Opportunities, Challenges and Research Directions. Management Accounting Research 19(4):287–300.

Messner, M. 2009. The Limits of Accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(8):918–38.

Miller, C., L. Cardinal, and C. Miller. 2014. Strategic Planning And Firm Performance : A Synthesis Of More Than Two Decades Of Research. The Academy of Management Journal 37(6):1649–65

Modell, S. 2001. Performance Measurement and Institutional Processes: A Study of Managerial Responses to Public Sector Reform. Management Accounting Research 12(4):437–64.

____________. 2009. Bundling Management Control Innovations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 22(1):59–90.

Muchtar, A. 2005. Analisis Manajemen Mutu Terpadu (TQM) Dalam Pelayanan Rumah Sakit. Artikel Akuntansi Manajemen, dari :

Newell, S., M. Robertson, and J. Swan. 2001. Management Fads and Fashion. Management Accounting Research 8:11.

Noveristi, N. 2014. Rencana Strategis Teknologi Informasi Dengan Pendekatan Grid Strategic Mc. Farlan (Studi Kasus : PDAM Tirtawening Kota Bandung). Skripsi, Unikom, Bandung, Indonesia

Nuhu, N. A., K. Baird., and R. Appuhami. 2016. The Association between the Use of Management Accounting Practices with Organizational Change and Organizational Performance. Advances in Management Accounting. 67–98

Parker, L. and G. Gould. 1999. Changing Public Sector Accountability: Critiquing New Directions. Accounting Forum 23(2):109–35

Pavlatos, O., and I. Paggios. 2008. Management Accounting Practices in the Greek Hospitality Industry. Managerial Auditing Journal 24(1):81–98.

Peel, M. and J. Bridge. 1998. How Planning and Capital Budgeting Improve SME Performance. Long Range Planning 31(6): 848-856.

Sakantia, A. 2014. Pengaruh Penerapan Total Quality Management (TQM) Terhadap Pencapaian Status Akreditasi Rumah Sakit Umum. Skripsi, Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata, Semarang, Indonesia

.Sandelin, M. 2008. Operation of Management Control Practices as a Package-A Case Study on Control System Variety in a Growth Firm Context. Management Accounting Research 19(4):324–43.

Sarkis, J. 2001. Benchmarking for Agility. Benchmarking: An International Journal 8(2):88–107.

Susilo, J. 2006. Benchmarking Peningkatan Layanan Pemerintah Daerah Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis. Aplikasi Bisnis 6(9):728-740.

Van H, G. Jan and P. Jansen. 2003. New Public Management in Dutch Local Government. Local Government Studies 29(2):68–88.

Wally, S., and M. Becerra., 2001. Top Management Team Characteristicsand Strategic Changes in International Diversification: The Case of U.S. Multinationals in the Europen Community. SAGE Journals 26(2):165–188.


Article Metrics

Abstract viewed : 313 times
pdf files downloaded : 66 times

Print ISSN : 1412-775X | online ISSN : 2541-5204 JAB Stats