Faktor Penentu Dan Efek Bias Evaluasi Kinerja Di Perusahaan Indonesia

M. Sesilia Lidwina Y.S.S, Monika Palupi Murniati,



Abstract

This study examines the determinants and effects of performance evaluation bias on manufacturing companies in Indonesia. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the information gathering costs and the relationship between manager and employee affect the emergence of centrality bias and leniency bias, and also to determine the effect of centrality bias and leniency bias on employee performance incentives.
The samples are all managers who work in large scale manufacturing companies located in Semarang. Sampling method by purposive sampling. Hypothesis testing is done by multiple regression. This study proves that : (1) The information gathering costs has positive influence on the centrality bias and leniency bias, (2) the relationship between manager and employee has positive influence on the centrality bias and leniency bias, (3) centrality bias does not affect the employee’s performance incentives above average or below average, (4) leniency bias affects employee performance incentives.

Abstrak
Penelitian ini meneliti tentang faktor penentu dan efek dari bias evaluasi kinerja pada perusahaan manufaktur yang ada di Indonesia. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah biaya pengumpulan informasi dan hubungan antara manajer dengan karyawan mempengaruhi munculnya centrality bias dan leniency bias, dan juga untuk mengetahui pengaruh centrality bias dan leniency bias terhadap performance incentives karyawan.
Sampel penelitian ini adalah semua manajer yang bekerja di perusahaan manufaktur skala menengah besar yang terdapat di Semarang. Metode pengambilan sampel secara purposive sampling. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan regresi berganda. Penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa : (1) Biaya pengumpulan informasi berpengaruh positif terhadap centrality bias dan leniency bias, (2) hubungan antara manajer dengan karyawan berpengaruh positif terhadap centrality bias dan leniency bias, (3) centrality bias tidak berpengaruh terhadap performance incentives karyawan yang di atas rata-rata maupun yang di bawah rata-rata, (4) Leniency bias mempengaruhi performance incentives karyawan.

Save to Mendeley



Keywords

Information gathering costs, employee-manager relationships, centrality bias, leniency bias, performance incentives.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Baker, G. P., R. Gibbons, and K. J. Murphy. 1994. Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4): 1125–1156.

Berger, J., C. Harbring, and D. Sliwka. 2010. Performance Appraisals and the Impact of Forced Distribution: An Experimental Investigation. Working Paper, IZA 5020: 1-44.

Bol, J. C. 2008. Subjectivity in Compensation Contracting. Journal of Accounting Literature 27: 1–27.

Bol, J. C. 2011. The Determinants and Performance Effects of Managers’ Performance Evaluation Biases. The Accounting Review, 86 (5), 1549-1575.

Bol, J. C. and S. D. Smith. 2011. Spillover Effects in Subjective Performance Evaluation: Bias and the Asymetric Influence of Controllability. The Accounting Review, 86 (4), 1213-1230.

Bol, J.C. 2007. The Determinants and Performance Effects of Supervisor Bias. The Accounting Review 89 (3): 1407–1439.

Breuer, K., P. Nieken, and D. Sliwka. 2010. Social Ties and Subjective Performance Evaluations: An Empirical Investigation. Review Management Science, 7, 141-157.

Brewer, M. B. 1999. The Psychology Of Prejudice : Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate. Journal of social issues,Vol.55,No.3.

Carolin, B.1993. Menjadi Sekretaris Profesional. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta : Bina Rupa Aksara.

Ghozali, I. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS19.Edisi Kelima.Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro.

Gibbs, M., K. A. Merchant, W. A. Van der Stede, and M. E. Vargus. 2004. Determinants and effects of subjectivity in incentives. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 409–436.

Golman, R. and S. Bhatia. 2012. Performance Evaluation Inflation and Compression. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 534-543.

Gurbuz, S. and O. Dikmenli. 2007. Performance Appraisal Biases In A Public Organization: An Emprical Study. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (13) 2007 / 1 : 108-138.

Handojono, M. dan M. Sholihin.2014. Bagaimana Mengurangi Bias Kemurahan Hati Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Subjektif? Sebuah Pendekatan Eksperimen. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia 11 (1): 40 – 56.

Harris, M. M. 1994. Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework.Journal of Management 20 (4): 737–756.

Hartanto, H. dan I. Wijaya.2001.Analisis Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan Terhadap Judment Auditor. Jurnal akuntansi dan manajemen 2 (3).

Hartono, J. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis.Edisi Keenam. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Sinamo, J. 2003. Etos Kerja Profesional.Jakarta : PT.Spirit Mahardika.

Jensen, M. C and W.H. Meckling.1976.The Theory of The Firm: Manajerial Behaviour, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial and Economics 3:305-360.

Khasanah, U. 2004. Etos Kerjasama Menuju Puncak Prestasi.Yogyakarta : Harapan Utama.

Kusdi. 2009. Teori Organisasi dan Administrasi.Jakarta : Salemba Humanika.

Masdupi, E. 2005. Analisis Dampak Struktur Kepemilikan Pada Kebijakan Hutang Dalam Mengontrol Konflik Keagenan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia 20 (1): 57-59.

Moers, F. 2005. Discretion and bias in performance evaluation: The impact of diversity and subjectivity. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 (1): 67–80.

Prendergast, C. dan R. H. Topel.1996. Favoritism in Organizations.Journal of Political Economy, 104(5): 958-78.

Prendergast, C. 1999. The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (1): 7–63.

Tajfel, H. 1982. Sosial Psychology Of Intergroup Relations. Annual Reviews Psychol 1982, 33:1-39.

Wherry, R. J. and C. J. Bartlett. 1982. The Control of Bias Ratings: A Theory of Rating. Personnel Psychology, 35, 521-552.

Wright, S. 1997. The Extended Contact Effect :Knowledge of Cross-Group Friendships and Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1997,Vol.73,No.1:73-90.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v17i2.2339

Article Metrics

Abstract viewed : 62 times
PDF files downloaded : 14 times



Print ISSN : 1412-775X | online ISSN : 2541-5204 JAB Stats